Yosh Omniscient 0.96 and Mazzolari Zagara

| |

YHO096.gif

YOSH OMNISCIENT 0.96: Independent and self-taught perfumer-numerologist-aromatherapist (etc.) Yosh Han took the concept of omniscience -- "the capacity to know everything infinitely" -- and created an Everything Plus The Kitchen Sink fragrance to illustrate it.

Incorporating gardenia, egyptian tuberose, fig, lilac, violet, kush (or cannabis), tunisian opium, sandalwood, vanilla, basil, clove, geranium and pink grapefruit (i.e. every trendy essence of the moment), Omniscient 0.96 is pretty much a Frankenstein's Monster of a fragrance, lurching awkwardly from a clashing intro of grapefruit, tuberose and cannabis into a thick, floral and over-spiced mid-phase until it finally wheezes to a sandalwood-vanilla finish that's . . . actually kind of nice. It's just a shame about everything that precedes it.

Omniscient 0.96 reminds me of my first experiment with making cookies when I was ten years old -- I figured if chocolate chips and peanut butter and caramel sauce and marshmallows and strawberry jam and Captain Crunch cereal (with bananas!) were all good on their own, then they'd be fantastic all mixed together and baked as cookies, right? I mean, they'd be the best cookies EVER, right?!!!


"Now I know what it feels like to be god!"

Sadly, I was oh so wrong, and Yosh Omniscient 0.96 is also oh so wrong in exactly the same way: too many favorite ingredients in one mixing bowl = gloppy disaster. To add insult to injury, Ms. Han charges $130.00 for 8ml of this mash-up, resulting in a middling (at best) perfume that's nearly $500.00 an ounce.

*blink*

There's so much excellent perfumery out there that is far superior to Omniscient 0.96, and you don't even need to look very hard to find it. Both Barneys and Lucky Scent, which carry the Yosh line, carry numerous other brands (Le Labo, Serge Lutens, Frederic Malle, Armani Prive, Vero Profumo, Sarah Horowitz and more) that beat the unholy stuffing out of Omniscient 0.96 for the same, if not lower, price point.

I hate to say it, but the one positive aspect of our present economic crunch is that overpriced, new-agey perfumers like Yosh Han might find themselves out of clients and out of business, and while I hear that some of Yosh Han's other work is better than Omniscient 0.96 -- simpler, and more wearable -- my experience with Omniscient has stripped me of the will to find out for myself.

***Note: I surfed the net to see if there were any of my usual trusted sources (Now Smell This, Perfume Smellin' Things, The Non-Blonde, Perfume Posse, etc.) who rave about Yosh, but what I encountered were reactions mostly along the lines of: "It wasn't terrible, but it's not great, either, and the price and the new-agey blah-blah clash tragically."

I agree.

MAZZOLARI ZAGARA: Zagara is definitely better than I expected it to be, with the added bonus of turning more and more beautiful the longer it hangs around the premises, but that initial spicy blast when it first pours out of the bottle is a little startling.

I read that orange blossoms have traditionally been used as bridal wreaths, that orange blossom is a common ingredient in Middle Eastern desserts and that some of the sweetest honey is from bee hives that are placed in orange groves, but Zagara is not the succulent, pretty fragrance that all this talk of orange blossoms might lead one to believe.

The opening to Zagara is green and sharp, almost medicinal in a male after-shave kind of way. I was ready to write it off as a failure until, several hours in, the bold sharpness dissipated and what was left was a soft white musk that smooths over the jagged edges and reins in the concoction to the point where it actually starts to smell like delicious orange blossoms and not some kind of Stetson wannabe.

So if you can hold out through its rather bold and odd beginning, Zagara will reward your patience with a truly lovely drydown of subtle orange flowers and gauzy musk. Much like Omniscient 0.96, however, is it really necessary (or worth it) to suffer through a beginning you don't like just to get to a drydown that you do?

Well, no big surprise here, but I guess I'm not really the suffering type. I don't have to love every single moment of a fragrance, but I want to at least appreciate what it's doing and where it's going, yet while Zagara's finale is ultimately lovely (and that's an understatement), I'm not an appreciative fan of the first three hours of its juggling act.

One positive note in its favor: the Lucky Scent site states that Zagara was "intended ... to be worn on its own or mixed with other fragrances" -- so mixing it up with a sweet amber, a soft patchouli or even a brighter citrus scent might alleviate the tension at its intro while accentuating everything that's good about its drydown. I'm off to experiment!

UPDATE (10/30/09):

I've since experienced Yosh Han's Trompeur, plus her work for Lucky Scent, Untitled #1. I like both a lot, and think that Yosh succeeds best with a less cluttered palette.

Katie Puckrik posted a nice review of Yosh Sottile 1.61 that appears to underscore this assertion.




Comments

8 Comments

Tara said:

I concur on the Yosh - nice, but not worth the price. Haven't smelled the Mazzolari Zagara, but I see I'm not missing anything. I much prefer the L'Artisan, SL and Laura Tonatto orange blossom scents.

Zagara was my introduction to the orange blossom, and I can see I'm going to have to do some further exploring. I thought the smell of it was beautiful, once the actual orange blossom began to shine through.

The three you mentioned are going on my list.

sharil said:

I liked Mazzolari's Fleurs d'Oranger better. Not sure why they did two orange blossom scents but, at any rate, it's a nice one. Rather linear and too restrained to really be beautiful, but a solid piece of work.

Oh! Okay -- I'll have to give Fleurs d'Oranger a try. There were some comments I read where people thought that perhaps Zagara was Mazzolari's attempt to create a version of an orange blossom fragrance that would appeal to a unisex to masculine consumer, but that it veered off a little wrong.

Maybe Fleurs d'Oranger is their orange blossom done properly?

Marin said:

Leading more accomplished bloggers astray since 2008.

I generally appreciate downturns in the economy for the weeding out of superfluous and self-important products and companies as well as a huge leap in customer service almost everywhere.

Laissez-faire, you perfume economists!

Now that you mention it, I have actually noticed that customer service is significantly improving. I get a much quicker turnaround when I ask questions, and a far better attitude to go along with it.

But really, is it necessary to lose half your customers before you begin to appreciate the ones you have left?

Marin said:

My thoughts exactly. Though it does give me that extra leverage: "In these trying economic times, I would think you'd treat your customers better..."

BTW, I'm getting very, very tired of the "these hard times" thing and I keep hearing it come out of my very own mouth. It's like when "awesome" gained ubiquity in the 80s.

I used the word "awesome" in an email I was writing today -- then backtracked and deleted it.

I can no longer employ it without irony (funny, but I think that's exactly what the general manager said at my last performance review).

About this Entry

Nathan Branch published on March 9, 2009 11:57 AM.

Hilde Soliani: Bell'Antonio and Vecchi Rossetti was the previous entry in this blog.

Pity You Lost Your Job, But Aren't My New Shoes Fabulous? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


Other Shops & Sites

Powered by Movable Type 4.34-en